Every time we play I interpret Hesken's skills differently then my friends. I want to know who's right.
If you use both Wizard's Eye and Orbs of Fire - they BOTH say that INSTEAD of moving you can move them.
I see this as you can stand in one place, move your Eye and Orbs AND Attack.
My friends read it and they feel that "instead of moving" means you still have to use one of your actions to use that ability.
So you can either move twice, attack and move or move and attack - so THEY think I could move my wizards eye and attack, or move my eye and move my character (but not attack), etc. while I tell them, "No, I just can't move. I can stand here, do everything AND attack since I'm using these abilities INSTEAD of moving" but I can't seem to win the argument.
I guess Hesken can get powerful if he finds the Flying Carpet, because it says you can use the Carpet "instead of moving" so technically at that point I could move my Wizards Eye, move my Orbs of Fire, move the Flying Carpet (with me on top of it) AND fire once I've moved the carpet (since it doesn't could as movement).
What does everyone think?
The "Instead of Moving" is the big argument and we all read it differently.
If you use both Wizard's Eye and Orbs of Fire - they BOTH say that INSTEAD of moving you can move them.
I see this as you can stand in one place, move your Eye and Orbs AND Attack.
My friends read it and they feel that "instead of moving" means you still have to use one of your actions to use that ability.
So you can either move twice, attack and move or move and attack - so THEY think I could move my wizards eye and attack, or move my eye and move my character (but not attack), etc. while I tell them, "No, I just can't move. I can stand here, do everything AND attack since I'm using these abilities INSTEAD of moving" but I can't seem to win the argument.
I guess Hesken can get powerful if he finds the Flying Carpet, because it says you can use the Carpet "instead of moving" so technically at that point I could move my Wizards Eye, move my Orbs of Fire, move the Flying Carpet (with me on top of it) AND fire once I've moved the carpet (since it doesn't could as movement).
What does everyone think?
The "Instead of Moving" is the big argument and we all read it differently.